DRAFT #1-Project Description
Problem of Practice Preview
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that the Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services develop a State Performance Plan (SPP) for Special Education. Each year, we are required to report on progress of that plan through the Annual Performance Report (APR). There are twenty indicators for Part B Special Education that looks at how well Michigan’s students with disabilities are achieving and the infrastructure in place to support the implementation of IDEA--similar to a report card. Specifically, reporting of identification of children with disabilities, suspension/expulsion by race/ethnicity, educational environments and several other areas related to the education of students with disabilities. These data are reported in the APR. In addition, Regulation §300.646 of the IDEA requires Michigan to collect and report data annually for determining if significant disproportionality based on race and ethnicity is occurring in the districts. Specific areas of concern are:
a. identification of children with disabilities,
b. identification of children with disabilities in specific disability categories,
c. placement of children in particular education settings, and
d. disciplinary actions including suspensions and expulsions.
The areas of concerns are looked at through a different lens for the APR reporting. This is where much of the confusion occurs because most believe that the SPP/APR reporting requirements are the same as significant disproportionality and this is not the case.
It is my belief that the district level people I work with don’t have a clear understanding of these reporting requirements. District personnel need to understand what significant disproportionality is, as well as, the implications for districts identified with having significant disproportionality. Additionally, it is important for the learner to understand the difference between significant disproportionality and the reporting requirements for the APR. In my role as data analyst, I feel we need to find a way to teach educators across Michigan regarding these requirements. However, logistics makes it difficult to meet in person all the time with every single educator in Michigan. Therefore, we need a means of bringing this information to educators quickly and efficiently. Furthermore, I believe a research-based teaching strategy such as “Identifying Similarities and Differences”, as explained in Brabec’s article, could be an effective method of instructing educators on this topic.
District’s identified with significant disproportionality can have an impact on student learning because: 1) districts receiving IDEA funds must reallocate 15% of their grant money for the identified school year to coordinated early intervening services, 2) the district must also review all policies, procedures and practices regarding the identification of children with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), and 3) the district is required to report to the public on any revisions of their policies, procedures and practices. Understanding the APR reporting requirements and significant disproportionality is important because when students are inappropriately identified, disciplined or placed in particular educational settings it may result in negative educational consequences such as limited access to the general education curriculum. Therefore, we should make every effort to clear up the confusion. In fact, I see this as a need and an opportunity for professional development and as a continued effort to ensure compliance with the IDEA to improve programs and services for Michigan’s students with disabilities. Intermediate School District and school district special education administrators or others responsible for students with IEPs will benefit from learning about these federal mandates. Specifically, addressing this problem is worth the effort because it can ultimately make a big difference in the learning environment for students with disabilities across the State.
Julie - First I want to commend you for being in this profession! As a general education teacher, understanding laws and requirements for special education is like interpreting hieroglyphics! Here are my initial reflections on your first draft of your problem:
ReplyDelete1. You do a very nice job in your introduction of making the reader want to continue reading because you are leading up to the problem with a solid foundation of state federal law requirements. As a teacher, this gets my attention because I have seen my school get “drug through the courts” over special education policies. However, I as a teacher do not have these things memorized like I do the process for balancing a chemical equation, and sometimes that scares me. Gen. Ed. Teachers definitely could use some more training in this area, and I agree that technology can help get the word out better.
2. I had slight difficulty fluently comprehending the meaning of “significant disproportionality” the first time I read through your work since I don’t use or hear that term regularly. My recommendation would be to add a sentence containing its definition/interpretation as your second to the last sentence in your first paragraph. This would help readers like me grasp your content more fully without having to think so hard!
3. Although your Problem of Practice Preview flows really well, after finishing the entire piece I wasn’t exactly sure/clear as what your problem of practice was. Once I re-read it I think I have a better idea. I have identified this portion of your writing as your problem of practice:
“District personnel need to understand what significant disproportionality is, as well as, the implications for districts identified with having significant disproportionality. Additionally, it is important for the learner to understand the difference between significant disproportionality and the reporting requirements for the APR. In my role as data analyst, I feel we need to find a way to teach educators across Michigan regarding these requirements.”
I think it would be helpful to somehow narrow this information into one concise sentence. I’m definitely not saying take the above information out of your writing. I really like this grouping of sentences: I think it gives perspective on the complexity and interdependency of your core issue. However, I just found myself trying to pinpoint your exact concern at the end of my reading and I couldn’t do it. This may also just be a personal thing as I am not as familiar with this content. I recommend placing a concise sentence either before or after this part stating your big concern. Having a concise sentence might help you narrow your scope a bit to make it “just right” – as in the Goldilocks analogy.
4. I like your reference to the Brabac article for a strategy to help implement your technology, however, it seems a little like it is worth developing this thought further through inserting an entire paragraph on this; separate from the one it’s in. I know this assignment does not want us to focus on the solutions/strategies, so perhaps you already planned on expanding this in your final version.
5. Finally, I think your last paragraph probably could be broken down in to two paragraphs. The first about how significant disproportionality can impact student learning and your three reasons, and the second more of a conclusion where you are restating why your issue is important.
6. Your topic is very interesting. Something I never knew existed, so I am excited to see what you come up with to help get your message out to educators such as myself!
7. Overall, very good writing. I had to think VERY hard to come up with (hopefully) helpful suggestions. They didn’t automatically pop out at me as I read! Nice work!
Julie, I think you did a TERRIFIC job here...you definitely are passionate for your field and I believe it takes a special person to have the patience and focus to take on these challenges. I know our special ed department always have their hands full.. and some! I think Jess did an amazing job commenting on your draft... good job Jess!
ReplyDeleteI think you have made a very compelling case for yourself and you support it wonderfully!!!!
It is well thought out with wonderful examples. I think you are on to something and that this is something that could help out many teachers alike in your field.
I agree with the confusion of "signigicant disproportionality" and found myself having to go back and read again...probably because I am not familiar with a lot in your field. Where did you find the Brabec article?? I read the Bransford article.
It appears that you are well on your way and went above and beyond what was required for the first draft! Great job!
After reading through Jess' Regena's comments, the only thing I found myself wondering about what is an ISD/RESD responsibility and where/when does it become a school district responsibility? At the teacher level this information was brand new stuff. Most of the time the SRESD and district administrators handle reporting in. I'm very interested learning more about this! You did a wonderful job of describing your problem! Your passion for this topic came shining through=8-)
ReplyDeleteHi Julie,
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like you have made great strides already! I love what you mentioned about the StAIR project too. I'm currently working on mine for 811, and it's amazing how it has changed my perspective of using powerpoint and actually incorporating it as a strategy based teaching tool, as opposed to an alternative to the ELMO.
I have to say that wikis can be very fun too...I had my students create a companion site to the Inferno by creating and linking pages through Wikispaces. I found that there were many times they had suggestions and guidance for me on how we could better organize/add widgets/etc, and the more I embraced their input, the more ownership they took over the site. I'm not sure what site you're using, but I've used wikispaces in the past. Have fun exploring...they are so multi-purpose!
~Lindsay
(So I totally thought I posted this comment last week, but it might have been before I was a member of the blog. So here it is again, but now it seems outdated since we've been talking about wikis on our board, but oh well:)